Abstract
The “affective” turn has enabled many scholars to theorise media representations not only as texts that can be distantly decoded but also as a matter of emotional attachments, intensities of feelings, synesthetic sensations, and embodied experiences. Yet, what has been less often theorized is how this affective meaningmaking is (re)shaped by the dynamic and interactive nature of social networking systems such as Facebook or Twitter. How do images and the affective qualities that “stick” to them, travel and transform through user engagement where “users grab images and technologies by which they are grabbed in return” (Paasonen, Carnal Resonance 178; Senft 2008). We aim to explore this question further through examples of humorous images from the January 2017 Women’s March, considered within the digital contexts of Facebook and Twitter. Social movement scholars argue that emotional engagement can be a powerful and positive motivating factor in getting people involved in political life, and we here suggest that these humorous images can move the reader in new critical directions, encouraging them to challenge systems of inequality and oppression in contemporary society.
References
Ahmed, Sara. The Promise of Happiness. Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2010.10.1515/9780822392781Search in Google Scholar
Baym, Geoffrey. From Cronkite to Colbert: The Evolution of Broadcast News. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Whitefish: Kessinger, (1901) 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Bore, Inger-Lise Kalviknes and Reid, Grace. “Laughing in the Face of Climate Change? Satire as a Device for Engaging Audiences in Public Debate.” Science Communication 36. 4 (2014): 454-47810.1177/1075547014534076Search in Google Scholar
boyd, danah. It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale: Yale University Press, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, David. “Twitter: 12 Million Inauguration Tweets Friday, 11.5 Million Women’s March Tweets Saturday.” Adweek (23 January 2017). Web. 6 June 2017 <http://www.adweek.com/digital/twitter-12-million-inauguration-tweets-friday-11-5- million-womens-march-tweets-saturday/>Search in Google Scholar
Couldry, Nick. “The Myth of ‘Us’: Digital Networks, Political Change and the Production of Collectivity.” Information, Communication and Society 18.6 (2014): 608-626.10.1080/1369118X.2014.979216Search in Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar
Chvasta, Marcyrose “Anger, Irony and Protest: Confronting the Issue of Efficacy, Again.” Text and Performance Quarterly 26.1 (2006): 5-16.10.1080/10462930500382278Search in Google Scholar
Dahlgren, Peter. Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Dean, Jodi. “Technology: The Promise of Communicative Capitalism.” Reclaiming Democracy: Judgement, Responsibility and the Right to Politics. Eds. Azmanova, Albena and Mihai, Mihaela, London and New York: Routledge, 2015: 50-76.Search in Google Scholar
Dean, Jodi. “Affect and Drive.” Networked Affect. Eds. Hills, Ken, Paasonen, Susanna and Petit, Michael, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2015: 89-100.Search in Google Scholar
Dean, Jodi. Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Dean, Jodi. “Communicative Capitalism: Circulation and Foreclosure of Capitalism.” Cultural Politics 1.1 (2005): 51-74.10.2752/174321905778054845Search in Google Scholar
Enli, Gunn Sara and Skogerbø, Eli. “Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics.” Information, Communication and Society 16.5 (2013): 757-774.10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330Search in Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “Humour.” Art and literature: Jensen’s Gradiva, Leonardo da Vinci and Other Works. 14. Ed. Dickson, Albert, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1927: 425-434.Search in Google Scholar
Gould, Deborah. “On Affect and Protest.” Political Emotions: New Agendas in Communication. Eds. Staiger, Janet, Cvetkovich, Ann and Reynolds, Ann, London and New York: Routledge, 2010: 18-44.Search in Google Scholar
Graefer, Anne. “‘Reading’ Through the Skin: Lady Gaga’s Online Representation and Affective Meaning-Making.” The Journal of Popular Culture 49.3 (2016): 522-540.10.1111/jpcu.12424Search in Google Scholar
-----. “The Work of Humour in Affective Capitalism: A Case Study of Celebrity Gossip Blogs.” Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization (2016): 143-162Search in Google Scholar
Grusin, Richard. Premediation: Affect and Mediality After 9/11. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article.” New German Critique 3 (1974): 49-55.10.2307/487737Search in Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall and Capella, Joseph N. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Jeffrey P. Entertaining Politics: Satirical Television and Political Engagement. USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgement. Whitefish: Kessinger, 1790/2004.Search in Google Scholar
Karlyn, Kathleen Rowe. “Roseanne: Unruly Woman as Domestic Goddess.” Critiquing the Sitcom: A Reader. Ed. Morreale, Joane, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2003: 251-261.Search in Google Scholar
Kavka, M. (2008), Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Kearney, Laila. “Hawaii Grandma’s Plea Launches Women’s March in Washington.” Reuters (5 December 2016). Web. 6 June 2017 <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-women-idUSKBN13U0GW>Search in Google Scholar
Kjus, Yngvar and Kaare, Birgit Hertzberg. “Humour, Medier og Mennesker.” Humor i Mediene. Eds. Kjus, Yngvar and Kaare, Birgit Hertzberg, Oslo: Cappelen, 2006: 13-35.Search in Google Scholar
Kyrölä, Katariina. “Expanding Laughter: Affective Viewing, Body Image Incongruity and ‘Fat Actress.’” Working with Affect in Feminist Readings. Disturbing Differences. Ed. Marianne Liljeström and Susanna Paasonen. London & New York: Routledge, 2010. 72-85.Search in Google Scholar
Marcus, George E. The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. New York: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002Search in Google Scholar
Medhurst, Andy. A National Joke: Popular Comedy and English Cultural Identities. London and New York: Routledge, 2007.10.4324/9780203022566Search in Google Scholar
Mellencamp, Patricia. “Situation Comedy, Feminism, and Freud: Discourses of Gracie and Lucy.” Critiquing the Sitcom: A Reader. Ed. Morreale, Joan, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2003: 41-55.Search in Google Scholar
Morozov, Evgeny. “The Brave New World of Slacktivism.” Foreign Policy (19 May 2009). Web. 26 June 2017 < http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/05/19/the-brave-new-world-of-slacktivism/>Search in Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. On the Political. London: Routledge, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Search in Google Scholar
Neale, Steve and Krutnik, Frank. Popular Film and Television Comedy. London and New York: Routledge, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
Paasonen, Susanna. “A Midsummer’s Bonfire: Affective Intensities If Online Debate.” Networked Affect. Ed. Ken Hillis, Susanna Paasonen, and Michael Petit. Massachusett: MIT Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
-----. “Between Meaning and Mattering: On Affect and Porn Studies.” Porn Studies 1.1-2 (2014): 136-142. Web. 30 July 2014.Search in Google Scholar
-----. Carnal Resonance: Affect and Online Pornography. Cambridge & London: MIT Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
-----. “Networked Affect.” MIT Press. Ed. Ken Hillis, Susanna Paasonen, and Michael Petit. Massachusett: N.p., 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, Jerry. The Logic of the Absurd: On Film and Television Comedy. London: BFI, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Pariser, Eli The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding. London: Penguin, 2012.10.3139/9783446431164Search in Google Scholar
Pedwell, Carolyn. “Mediated Habits: Images , Networked Affect and Social Change.” Subjectivity (2017): 1-23.10.1057/s41286-017-0025-ySearch in Google Scholar
Pybus, Jennifer. “Accumulating Affect: Social Networks and Their Archives of Feelings.” Networked Affect. Ed. Ken Hillis, Susanna Paasonen, and Michael Petit. Massachusett: MIT Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Rentschler, Carrie A., and Samantha C. Thrift. “Doing Feminism in the Network: Networked Laughter and the ‘Binders Full of Women’ Meme.” Feminist Theory 16.3 (2015): 329-359.10.1177/1464700115604136Search in Google Scholar
Ruest, Nick. “14,478,518 #WomensMarch Tweets January 12-28, 2017.” Ruebot. (30 January 2017). Web. 6 June 2017 <http://ruebot.net/post/14478518-womensmarch-tweets-january-12-28-2017>Search in Google Scholar
Senft, Theresa. Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks. New York: Peter Lang, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Stein, Louisa Ellen. “Fandom/Resistance.” Keynote, Fan Studies Network Conference, University of Huddersfield, 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Tyler, Imogen. “‘Chav Mum Chav Scum’. Class Disgust in Contemporary Britain.” Feminist Media Studies 8.1 (2008): 17-34.10.1080/14680770701824779Search in Google Scholar
Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. “Mediated Citizenship: An Introduction.” Mediated Citizenship. Ed. K Wahl- Jorgensen, Routledge: New York, 2008: vii-xiii.Search in Google Scholar
Young, Dannagal G. “Political Satire and Occupy Wall Street: How Comics Co-opted Strategies of the Protest Paradigm to Legitimise a Movement.” The International Journal of Communication 7.1 (2013): 371-393.Search in Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. The Plague of Fantasies. London: Verso, 1997.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
